1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 557 F.Supp.
  5. 557 F.Supp. 52 (1982)
 

CITY OF ANTIOCH v. CANDIDATES' OUTDOOR GRAPHIC SERV.

Nos. C-82-0731-WWS, C-82-0832-WWS.

557 F.Supp. 52 (1982)

CITY OF ANTIOCH, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff, v. CANDIDATES' OUTDOOR GRAPHIC SERVICE, a California corporation, et al., Defendants. Cynthia J. FULTON and Candidates' Outdoor Graphic Service, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MEMBERS OF the CITY COUNCIL OF the CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

October 15, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne S. Canterbury, David W. Greenthal, Canterbury, Raub & Greenthal, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff Cynthia J. Fulton, defendant & counterclaimant Candidates' Outdoor Service.

William R. Galstan, City Atty., City of Antioch, Antioch, Cal., Dwight B. Bishop, Inc., Walnut Creek, Cal., for plaintiff and counterdefendant City of Antioch.

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

SCHWARZER, District Judge.

These consolidated actions bring before the Court the question of the constitutionality of the City of Antioch's ordinance limiting to the 60 day period before an election the posting of political signs that promote candidates for public office or advocate a position on upcoming ballot propositions.

The city, which bears the burden of showing that its ordinance comports with the First Amendment, seeks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases