HANKIN v. HANKIN


302 Pa.Super. 295 (1982)

448 A.2d 1049

Max A. HANKIN and Janet Hankin, v. Moe Henry HANKIN, Sabina Hankin, Perch P. Hankin, Gertrude Hankin, Benjamin R. Shanken and Pauline Shanken, and Estate of Samuel Hankin and Harriet Hankin and Pan American Associates. Appeal of Moe Henry HANKIN, Sabina Hankin, Perch P. Hankin, Gertrude Hankin, Benjamin Shanken, and Pauline Shanken.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Reargument Denied August 17, 1982.

Filed December 18, 1981.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied May 3, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Allen, Philadelphia, and Philip D. Weiss, Norristown, for appellants.

Franklin Poul, Philadelphia, for Max Hankin, etc., appellees.

Sheldon Bonovitz, Philadelphia, for Samuel Hankin, appellee.

Theodore R. Mann, Philadelphia, for Harriet Hankin, appellee.

Stephen G. Yusem, Norristown, for Pan American, appellee.

Before POPOVICH, WATKINS and VAN der VOORT, JJ.


PER CURIAM:

This controversy is no stranger to this Court. A full recital of the factual basis of the controversy is set forth in Hankin v. Hankin, 279 Pa.Super. 179, 420 A.2d 1090 (1980) and will not be repeated in this opinion.

The court below originally entered the following Decree Nisi after extensive hearings, findings of fact and conclusions of law:

"AND NOW this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases