1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 293 Md.
  5. 293 Md. 304 (1982)
 

IN RE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION NO. 186

[No. 144, September Term, 1981.]

293 Md. 304 (1982)

443 A.2d 120

IN RE: SPECIAL INVESTIGATION NO. 186

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 6, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert H. Turkus, with whom were Dow, Lohnes & Albertson on the brief, for appellant.

Stefan D. Cassella, Assistant Attorney General, with whom was Stephen H. Sachs, Attorney General, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON, RODOWSKY and COUCH, JJ.

SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

We shall hold in this case that when a witness appears pursuant to a summons issued by a prosecutor under Maryland Code (1957, 1976 Repl. Vol., 1977 Cum. Supp.) Art. 27, § 592A, it is permissible to make a record of that which a witness says.

Acting pursuant to authority from the Governor under Maryland Const. art. 5, § 3 (a) (3), the Attorney General of Maryland...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases