1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 91 N.J.
  5. 91 N.J. 426 (1982)
 

TANTUM v. BINZ

91 N.J. 426 (1982)

452 A.2d 667

WILFRED TANTUM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES D. BINZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 18, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence M. McHeffey argued the cause for appellant (Hanlon, Dempsey & McHeffey, attorneys).

Hugh Porter argued the cause for respondent (Enright, Porter & Lenney, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Botter, reported at 186 N.J.Super. 296, 302 (1981).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O'HERN — 6.

For affirmance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases