1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 185 N.J.
  5. 185 N.J. Super. 269 (1982)
 

TEANECK BD. OF ED. v. TEANECK TEACHERS ASS'N

185 N.J. Super. 269 (1982)

448 A.2d 487

TEANECK BOARD OF EDUCATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TEANECK TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 28, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Granello argued the cause for appellant (Murray, Granello & Kenney, attorneys; James P. Granello of counsel; Robert T. Lawless on the brief).

Sheldon H. Pincus argued the cause for respondent (Bucceri & Pincus, attorneys; Sheldon H. Pincus of counsel; Gregory T. Syrek on the brief).

Robert E. Anderson, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, argued the cause for Public Employment Relations Commission (Sidney H. Lehmann, General Counsel, attorney; Robert E. Anderson on the brief).

Before Judges McELROY and J.H. COLEMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by J.H. COLEMAN, J.A.D.

This case raises the novel question of whether the subject matter of racial discrimination falls within the scope of collective negotiations with a public employer. The Teaneck Board of Education (Board) contends that the grievance pertains to a subject matter outside the legal scope of negotiations, and hence was not arbitrable. The Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC) held that racial discrimination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases