1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 97 Wn.2d
  5. 97 Wn.2d 289 (1982)
 

IN RE STROH

No. C.D. 6869.

97 Wn.2d 289 (1982)

644 P.2d 1161

In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HUGH W. STROH, an Attorney at Law. NORM MALENG, Prosecuting Attorney, Petitioner, WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

May 13, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Boerner, Chief Criminal Deputy, Robert S. Lasnik, Deputy, and Norm Maleng, King County Prosecuting Attorney, pro se, for petitioner.

Kurt M. Bulmer, for respondent Bar Association.

James J. Lamont, Gerald B. Netzky, and Hugh W. Stroh, pro se, for respondent Stroh.

BRACHTENBACH, C.J.

We have been asked to review the actions of the Disciplinary Board in dismissing a complaint against an attorney who has been convicted of a felony. For the reasons set out below, we conclude that the Disciplinary Board erred. Pursuant to our inherent authority to supervise the practice of law, we have reviewed the record and conclude that attorney Hugh Stroh's actions warrant disbarment. We so order.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases