AMERICAN HANDLING EQUIP. v. T.C. MOFFATT & CO.


184 N.J. Super. 131 (1982)

445 A.2d 428

AMERICAN HANDLING EQUIPMENT, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. T.C. MOFFATT & CO., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 5, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth J. Fost argued the cause for appellant.

Leonard Rosenstein argued the cause for respondent T.C. Moffatt & Co. (Feuerstein, Sachs & Maitlin, attorneys).

Richard H. Foster argued the cause for respondent American Handling Equipment, Inc. (Ryan, Foster & Bonanno, attorneys).

Before Judges MICHELS, McELROY and J.H. COLEMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by McELROY, J.A.D.

In this case the trial judge, in a written opinion, held that defendant The Hartford Insurance Company (Hartford) had to defend its putative insured, American Handling Equipment Inc. (American) and to indemnify American against any judgment in a suit brought against it by Leonard Pringle arising out of accident and injuries occurring September 19, 1975. Hartford, which concededly issued no policy covering Pringle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases