1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 90 N.J.
  5. 90 N.J. 108 (1982)
 

OCHS v. FEDERAL INS. CO.

90 N.J. 108 (1982)

447 A.2d 163

CHRISTIAN J. OCHS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND CHUBB/PACIFIC INDEMNITY GROUP, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 30, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony Amabile argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Witham, Amabile & Takvorian, attorneys).

Patricia J. Cooney argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants (Shanley & Fisher, attorneys; Thomas F. Campion, of counsel).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.

The court below, with one judge dissenting, interpreted the limitations provision in the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (No Fault Act), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-11 to -16, differently from another panel of the Appellate Division in Danilla v. Leatherby Insurance Co., 168 N.J.Super. 515 (1979). Inasmuch as we agree with the Danilla approach, we reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases