VonRAVENSBERG v. HOUCK-CARROW CORP.

No. 105,679; CA A21580.

653 P.2d 1297 (1982)

60 Or.App. 412

Robert VonRavensberg, Dba Crystal Ice Co., Appellant, v. HOUCK-CARROW CORP., an Oregon Corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 1, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Lipscomb, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Blair, MacDonald, Jensen & Lipscomb, Salem.

Bruce W. Williams, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Williams & Spooner, Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.


THORNTON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict in his favor. He contends that the trial court erred in limiting the amount of damages submitted to the jury.

Plaintiff had been in the ice manufacturing and distributing business for 27 years. He moved from California to Eugene in 1971 to start an ice business. In September, 1976, he decided to expand his operations. He contacted Zero Ice Company, a Salem ice business. Zero Ice had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases