1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 534 F.Supp.
  5. 534 F.Supp. 1247 (1982)
 

UNITED STATES v. LILLA

Nos. 81-CR-53 to 81-CR-55.

534 F.Supp. 1247 (1982)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Michael LILLA, Mark Lilla, Robert Lilla, Douglas Pintka a/k/a "Dougan", Raymond C. Colehamer a/k/a "Charlie", Christopher Burch, Robert Moffre, Peter Santos a/k/a "Pete", Louis Ferraro, David Hine, Richard Strack, Michael Bouck and Frank Benson. UNITED STATES of America v. Mark LILLA, Robert Lilla and Everett Garnsey. UNITED STATES of America v. Donald BENSON.

United States District Court, N. D. New York.

As Amended March 15, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George H. Lowe, U. S. Atty., N. D. N. Y., Albany, N. Y., for plaintiff; George A. Yanthis, Asst. U. S. Atty., Albany, N. Y., of counsel.

George J. Camino, Schenectady, N. Y., for defendant Michael Lilla; Guido A. Loyola, Schenectady, N. Y., of counsel.

O'Connell & Aronowitz, P. C., Albany, N. Y., for defendant Mark Lilla; Stephen R. Coffey, Albany, N. Y., of counsel.

Parisi, Delorenzo, Gordon, Pasquareiello & Weiskopf, P. C., Schenectady, N. Y., for defendant Robert Lilla; John R. Massaroni, Schenectady, N. Y., of counsel.

Elena C. Vaida, Albany, N. Y., for defendant Douglas Pintka.

E. Stewart Jones, Jr., Troy, N. Y., for defendant Raymond Colehammer.

William J. Gray, Albany, N. Y., for defendant Christopher Burch; Laurie B. Kurtzman, Albany, N. Y., of counsel.

McDermott & Cheeseman, Albany, N. Y., for defendant Richard Strack; Paul E. Cheeseman, Albany, N. Y., of counsel.

Higgins, Roberts, Beyerl & Coan, P. C., Schenectady, N. Y., for defendant Michael Bouck.

Jerome K. Frost, Troy, N. Y., for defendants Frank Benson and Donald Benson.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

MUNSON, Chief Judge.

The defendants have been indicted for allegedly violating various federal laws concerning the trafficking of cocaine and marijuana. Following their arraignments, the defendants moved to suppress certain evidence derived from several wiretaps which had been authorized by New York State judges pursuant to New York law and which had been monitored by the New York State Police. The grounds asserted in these...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases