1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 544 F.Supp.
  5. 544 F.Supp. 908 (1982)
 

FARR MAN AND CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES

Court No. 79-10-01490.

544 F.Supp. 908 (1982)

FARR MAN AND CO., INC., and The National Sugar Refining Company, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Court of International Trade.

July 26, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, New York City (Rufus E. Jarman, Jr., and Jacqueline M. Nolan-Haley, New York City, on the briefs), for plaintiffs.

J. Paul McGrath, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney in Charge, New York City, Intern. Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch (Madeline B. Kuflik, New York City, on the briefs), for defendant.

Before RE, C. J., and LANDIS and BOE, JJ.

BOE, Judge:

By the institution of this action contesting the duty imposed upon raw sugar imported into the United States from Argentina, the validity and/or proper application of Presidential Proclamation 4547, has been placed in issue.

No material fact relied upon by plaintiffs or defendant is in controversy in their respective motions for summary judgment. Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 3 C.I.T. ___, Slip Op. 82-33 (April 30, 1982)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases