1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 552 F.Supp.
  5. 552 F.Supp. 891 (1982)
 

CURTO v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.

No. 82 C 1576.

552 F.Supp. 891 (1982)

Frank T. CURTO, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., a New York corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

December 15, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rudy J. Huizenga, Donnelly & Associates, P.C., Detroit, Mich., Elizabeth H. Seidman, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Diana C. White, Fox & Grove, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PRENTICE H. MARSHALL, District Judge.

This case presents two important questions under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34 (1976 & Supp. II 1978). We must decide what the time limit is for filing an age discrimination complaint under the ADEA with the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission ("EEOC") in a state which provides an administrative remedy for age discrimination, and to what extent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases