1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 559 F.Supp.
  5. 559 F.Supp. 861 (1982)
 

DABNEY v. REAGAN

No. 82 Civ. 2231 CSH.

559 F.Supp. 861 (1982)

Lorraine DABNEY, Elizabeth Deakyne, Robert and Julie McGibbon, City of Philadelphia, City of Saint Paul, Honorable Stephen L. Neal, M.C., Honorable Stewart B. McKinney, M.C., Honorable S. William Green, M.C., Solar Lobby, Natural Resources Defense Council, League of Women Voters, National Audubon Society, Nypirg/Citizens Alliance, National Association of Solar Contractors, First Hub Credit Union, Wayne and Susan Nichols, Michael N. Corbett, Harry K. Schwartz, Paul W. Sullivan, Joseph Honick, State of New York, Plaintiffs, v. Ronald REAGAN, David A. Stockman, Samuel R. Pierce, James B. Edwards, Donald T. Regan, John R. Block, and Malcolm Baldridge, in their official capacities, and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 19, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Ferrey, National Consumer Law Center, Boston, Mass., Alan Miller, Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, D.C., Eric Goldstein, Natural Resources Defense Council, New York City, Andre Dasent, Philadelphia, Pa., Ken Robinson, Atty. Gen., State of N.Y., New York City, for plaintiffs.

J. Paul McGrath, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., John S. Martin, U.S. Atty., New York City, Alphonse M. Alfano, Andrew M. Wolfe, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Washington, D.C., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, District Judge:

Plaintiffs move for an order compelling defendants to comply, in certain designated respects, with this Court's Order of June 29, 1982. Defendants contend that, in the light of present circumstances, the order of compliance should not issue. Defendants are correct, and the present motion is denied.

The circumstances of the litigation are fully set forth in the Court's prior opinion, Dabney v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases