1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 646 P.2d
  5. 646 P.2d 650 (1982)
 

SCHMELZER v. EMPLOYMENT DIV.

No. 81-AB-1203; CA A22399.

646 P.2d 650 (1982)

57 Or.App. 759

Fu Gen J. SCHMELZER, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION AND TEKTRONIX, Inc., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 16, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David N. Hobson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Jan Peter Londahl, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Employment Division. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Stanton F. Long, Deputy Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Richard S. Gleason, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Tektronix, Inc.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.

THORNTON, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of the Employment Appeals Board's (Board) denial of unemployment benefits. She contends that she was willing to continue to work for Tektronix for an additional period of time but was not allowed to do so. OAR 471-30-038(2)(b).1 The Board concluded that claimant had voluntarily left work.

Claimant worked as a keypunch operator from July 20, 1980, to May 22, 1981. On March 8, 1981, claimant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases