1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 534 F.Supp.
  5. 534 F.Supp. 692 (1982)
 

FRUCHTMAN v. NEW YORK STATE BD. OF LAW EXAMINERS

No. 82 Civ. 0292 (CBM).

534 F.Supp. 692 (1982)

David FRUCHTMAN, etc., Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

March 23, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James I. Meyerson, New York City, for plaintiff.

Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. of the State of N. Y., John M. Farrar, Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City, for defendants.

OPINION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

This action has its genesis in an event all too familiar to practitioners in this Court: the New York State Bar Examination (hereinafter referred to as Bar Exam). Plaintiff, David Fruchtman, alleges that the grading of Essay Question #5 in the February, 1981 Bar Exam was arbitrary and irrational, in violation of his rights under the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases