1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 545 F.Supp.
  5. 545 F.Supp. 635 (1982)
 

IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, PLC v. HENKEL CORP.

Civ. A. No. 78-301.

545 F.Supp. 635 (1982)

IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, PLC, Plaintiff, v. HENKEL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

Supplemental Opinion July 23, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas E. Whitney, Donald F. Parsons, Jr., Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Del., Paul N. Kokulis, Lawrence A. Hymo, William T. Bullinger, Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

William D. Bailey, Jr., Jeffrey M. Weiner, Bayard, Brill & Handelman, Wilmington, Del., Edward M. O'Toole, Michael F. Borun, Madeline Henricks, Merriam, Marshall & Bicknell, Chicago, Ill., Patrick J. Span, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant.

OPINION

STAPLETON, District Judge:

The recovery of copper from ore through solvent extraction has gained widespread commercial acceptance over the last decade. The reagents that effect this extraction are the subject matter of this patent case. Plaintiff Imperial Chemical Industries, PLC ("ICI"), a giant of the chemical world and a relatively recent entrant into the copper extraction reagent field here, alleges patent infringement against defendant Henkel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases