1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 293 S.E.2d
  5. 293 S.E.2d 807 (1982)
 

HOFFMAN v. RYDER TRUCK LINES, INC.

No. 89PA82.

293 S.E.2d 807 (1982)

Jack A. HOFFMAN, Employee, Plaintiff, v. RYDER TRUCK LINES, INC., Employer, Self-Insured, Defendant.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 3, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Byrd, Byrd, Ervin, Blanton, Whisnant & McMahon by C. Scott Whisnant, Morganton, for plaintiff-appellant.

Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes & Davis by Russell P. Brannon and Albert Sneed, Jr., Asheville, for defendant-appellee.

COPELAND, Justice.

It is axiomatic that an opinion and award entered by the Industrial Commission may not be disturbed on appeal unless a patent error of law exists therein. See G.S. 97-86; Godley v. County of Pitt, and cases there cited, ___ N.C. ___, 293 S.E.2d 167 (1982). In the instant case, our review is directed toward the resolution of a single issue: whether the Commission erred as a matter of law in finding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases