1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 515 F.Supp.
  5. 515 F.Supp. 448 (1981)
 

ANTI-MONOPOLY, INC. v. GENERAL MILLS FUN GROUP

No. C-74-0529 SW.

515 F.Supp. 448 (1981)

ANTI-MONOPOLY, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MILLS FUN GROUP, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

May 11, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Daggett, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., Oliver P. Howes, Jr., Nims, Howes, Collison & Isner, New York City, for defendant and counterclaimant General Mills Fun Group, Inc.

Carl E. Person, New York City, John H. Denton, Oakland, Cal., for plaintiff.

OPINION AND ORDER ON REMAND

SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Anti-Monopoly, Inc., a California corporation which has engaged in the business of selling a board game it calls ANTI-MONOPOLY, brought this action challenging the validity and enforceability of defendant's MONOPOLY game trademark. After a trial before this court, a judgment was granted declaring the MONOPOLY trademark valid and enforceable, and that Anti-Monopoly's use of the name ANTI...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases