1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 291 Md.
  5. 291 Md. 615 (1981)
 

HILL v. HILL

[No. 19, September Term, 1981.] [No. 31, September Term, 1981.]

291 Md. 615 (1981)

436 A.2d 67

MAE H. HILL v. THEODORE R. HILL, JR. LOIS F. RAUTH (MYERS) v. JAMES A. RAUTH

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided October 27, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

No. 19, Ellen Levy Widen, with whom were Joel Marc Abramson and Talkin & Abramson on the brief, for appellant and cross-appellee.

No. 19, Stephen N. Goldberg, with whom was Jerome F. Cohn on the brief, for appellee and cross-appellant.

No. 31, Michael J. Ragland, with whom were Bell & Ragland, P.A. on the brief, for appellant.

No. 31, Basil E. Moore, Jr., for appellee.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, DIGGES, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON AND RODOWSKY, JJ.

DAVIDSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

On 11 September 1981, Case No. 19, Hill v. Hill, and Case No. 31, Rauth (Myers) v. Rauth, were argued before this Court. We shall consider these cases together because they both present the common question whether, under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution,1 upon dissolution of a marriage, federal law2 precludes the division...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases