1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 519 F.Supp.
  5. 519 F.Supp. 356 (1981)
 

ENKA B. V. OF ARNHEM, HOLLAND v. E. I. DU PONT, ETC.

Civ. A. Nos. 80-358, 80-359.

519 F.Supp. 356 (1981)

ENKA B. V. OF ARNHEM, HOLLAND, Plaintiff, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO., Defendant. AKZO PLASTICS B. V. OF ARNHEM, HOLLAND, Plaintiff, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

July 10, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roderick R. McKelvie, Robinson, McKelvie & Geddes, Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff; Ellsworth H. Mosher, Charles A. Wendel, Roger W. Parkhurst and Thomas W. Cole, Stevens, Davis, Miller & Mosher, Arlington, Va., of counsel.

James M. Tunnell, Jr., Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Del., for defendant; Joseph M. Fitzpatrick, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, New York City, Robert C. Kline, Wilmington, Del., of counsel.

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

This opinion treats two closely allied actions under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, for determination of the validity and enforceability of United States patents. No answers have been filed, defendant having instead moved to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds. Plaintiffs are Dutch producers of industrial fibers potentially within the scope of claims of American patents owned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases