1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 637 P.2d
  5. 637 P.2d 114 (1981)
 

CREASEY v. HOGAN

No. 77-3743; CA 14498; SC 27443.

637 P.2d 114 (1981)

292 Or. 154

Charoyl M. CREASEY, Petitioner On Review, v. Charles A. HOGAN, Respondent On Review, and W. Douglas Hogan, a Partnership.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided December 9, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Frye, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Frye, Smith & Franz, Eugene.

Richard W. Butler, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were George A. Burgott and Thwing, Atherly & Butler, Eugene.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and LENT, LINDE, PETERSON, TANZER, and CAMPBELL, JJ.

PETERSON, Justice.

The defendant podiatrist in this malpractice action appeals from a judgment awarding damages to plaintiff for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of his negligence in the course of podiatric surgery and thereafter. The Court of Appeals reversed, Creasey v. Hogan, 48 Or.App. 683, 617 P.2d 1377 (1980). We accepted review to consider (1) the circumstances under which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases