1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 181 N.J.
  5. 181 N.J. Super. 565 (1981)
 

SUNRISE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES v. ROSELLE PARK

181 N.J. Super. 565 (1981)

438 A.2d 944

SUNRISE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PARK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 30, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harvey M. Douglen argued the cause for appellant (Stier & Douglen, attorneys; Harvey M. Douglen on the brief).

Joseph J. Triarsi argued the cause for respondent (Pisano & Triarsi, attorneys; Joseph J. Triarsi on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, McELROY and J.H. COLEMAN.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Feller in his written opinion reported in Sunrise Village Associates v. Roselle Park, 181 N.J.Super. 567 (Law Div. 1980).

We would simply add that we do not read § 3 of the ordinance of the Borough of Roselle Park which requires the security guard to make periodic patrol and inspections of the apartment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases