BERGER v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH

No. 79 Civ. 5653(MEL).

505 F.Supp. 192 (1981)

Stephen BERGER, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and Robert S. Corwin, Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

January 21, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter, New York City, for plaintiff; Stuart L. Potter, Stephen F. Bailly, New York City, of counsel.

William T. Marshall, Jr., New York City, for defendants.


LASKER, District Judge.

Stephen Berger alleges inter alia that Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated ("Merrill Lynch") and Robert S. Corwin, a securities salesman for Merrill Lynch, violated the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78b, and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, by failing to inform him that he did not own the underlying stock for four options purchased for his account, i. e. that he was engaged in "naked...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases