1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 517 F.Supp.
  5. 517 F.Supp. 137 (1981)
 

LOWEY v. WATT

Civ. Nos. 79-3314 to 79-3319.

517 F.Supp. 137 (1981)

Frederick W. LOWEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. WATT, et al., Defendants. John A. GALLAGHER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. WATT, et al., Defendants. J. E. HAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. WATT, et al., Defendants. Heinz and Ursula LICHTENSTEIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. WATT, et al., Defendants. James M. ROSS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. WATT, et al., Defendants, v. Eloise B. MILLER, Defendant Intervenor. Richard K. VITEK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James E. WATT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 28, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Jaffe, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

William E. Hill, Land & Natural Resources Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for federal defendants.

Jason R. Warran, Washington, D. C., for intervenor Eloise B. Miller.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.

These six consolidated cases are before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1361 and 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. There is no genuine issue of material fact. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that defendant and defendant-intervenor are entitled to summary judgment.

Facts

Section 17(c) of the Mineral Lands Leasing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases