HANSEN v. STOLL

No. 1 CA-CIV 4807.

130 Ariz. 454 (1981)

636 P.2d 1236

William H. HANSEN; Philip E. Jordan; Fred Madrid; Melvyn Robert Paulsen; Terry Michael Valentine; Robert Ayala; and Robert Chittendon, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Charles S. STOLL and Jane Stoll, his wife, Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Rehearing Denied November 2, 1981.

Review Denied November 17, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marton, Halladay & Hall, P.A. by Kraig J. Marton, Phoenix, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Lewis & Roca by John P. Frank and Jose A. Cardenas, Phoenix, for defendants-appellants.


OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

Following a jury trial, the appellant herein, Charles Stoll, was found to have maliciously defamed all of the appellees. The seven appellees-plaintiffs, all of whom were at some time connected with the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), recovered general and punitive damages against Stoll.1 All seven claimed damage to their professional reputations as law enforcement personnel resulting from Stoll...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases