1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 177 N.J.
  5. 177 N.J. Super. 358 (1981)
 

IN RE SHACK

177 N.J. Super. 358 (1981)

426 A.2d 1031

IN THE MATTER OF ELLIOT L. SHACK, O.D., P.A. AND CHARLES M. CUMMINS, O.D., P.A., LICENSED TO PRACTICE OPTOMETRY.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 30, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Giblin & Giblin, attorneys for defendants (Paul J. Giblin, on the brief).

John J. Degnan, Attorney General, attorney for respondents New Jersey State Board of Optometrists (Erminie L. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Douglas J. Harper, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, MORTON I. GREENBERG and ASHBEY.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants, Elliot Shack and Charles M. Cummins, are optometrists licensed by the New Jersey Board of Optometrists ("Board"). On October 3, 1979, the Board notified defendants by letter that it had reviewed their newspaper advertisement regarding soft contact lenses and had determined that it violated N.J.S.A. 45:12-11(h) and (o) and N.J.S.A. 45:1-21(b) in that

1. There is no delineation of what `professional care' includes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases