1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 496 Pa.
  5. 496 Pa. 35 (1981)
 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. EWING

496 Pa. 35 (1981)

436 A.2d 139

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. George E. EWING, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided October 28, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen B. Zerfoss, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Edward A. Burkardt, Asst. Disciplinary Counsel, Pittsburgh, for petitioner.

George E. Ewing, I.P.P., pro se.

Robert F. Frazier, Pittsburgh, for respondent.

Before O'BRIEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, KAUFFMAN and WILKINSON, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

WILKINSON, Justice.

This disciplinary proceeding stems from a report of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recommending that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for multiple violations of Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(4) which prohibits an attorney from engaging "in conduct involving fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation."

On February 17, 1978, a Petition for Discipline was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases