1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 177 N.J.
  5. 177 N.J. Super. 337 (1981)
 

IN RE MAHLER

177 N.J. Super. 337 (1981)

426 A.2d 1021

IN RE APPLICATION OF RUSSELL MAHLER ET AL., FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. IN RE PETITION OF HUDSON OIL REFINING CORPORATION. IN RE APPLICATION OF EDGEWATER TERMINALS, INC. IN RE APPLICATION OF RUSSELL W. MAHLER.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 29, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Horowitz argued the cause for appellants Russell W. Mahler and Edgewater Terminals, Inc. (Cummins, Dunn, Horowitz & Pashman, attorneys).

Charles F. Mandell argued the cause for appellant Hudson Oil Refining Corporation.

Robert J. Kleeblatt argued the cause for appellants Donald Wilson and James Carruthers.

Paul M. Cecere argued the cause for appellants Frank Reilly and Robert Vancio.

Eugene Callahan argued the cause for appellant Kenneth Mansfield (Bresin & Callahan, attorneys).

John A. Covino, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent State of New Jersey (John J. Degnan, Attorney General, attorney).

Ray A. Farrington, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent County of Bergen (Roger W. Breslin, Jr., Prosecutor of Bergen County, attorney).

K. Douglas Daniel, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (James J. West, Deputy Attorney General, attorney).

Before Judges ALLCORN, KOLE and PRESSLER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, J.A.D.

These consolidated appeals arise out of efforts by the State of Pennsylvania to prosecute a New Jersey corporation, Hudson Oil Refining Corporation (Hudson Oil), and a group of its officers and employees, also residents of New Jersey, who are alleged to have engaged in an illegal scheme involving the massive dumping of hazardous industrial wastes into the Susquehanna River. The cases raise important questions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases