1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 86 N.J.
  5. 86 N.J. 426 (1981)
 

IN RE SMOCK

86 N.J. 426 (1981)

432 A.2d 34

IN THE MATTER OF PAUL T. SMOCK, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 19, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

S.M. Chris Franzblau argued the cause for respondent (Franzblau & Falkin, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

In this matter respondent misappropriated $4,500 of his client's funds. He asserted (and, in varying degrees, proved) the complete array of mitigating circumstances which has traditionally warranted discipline less than disbarment, but which had been substantially rejected in In re Wilson, 81 N.J. 451 (1979). Respondent's conduct, however, predated Wilson. In view of the radical change effected by Wilson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases