1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 180 N.J.
  5. 180 N.J. Super. 210 (1981)
 

AMATO v. AMATO

180 N.J. Super. 210 (1981)

434 A.2d 639

JANET T. AMATO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOHN J. AMATO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 5, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold Koster argued the cause for appellant (Shevick, Ravich, Koster, Tobin, Oleckna & Reitman, attorneys).

Mortimer Katz argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges BOTTER, KING and McELROY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by McELROY, J.A.D.

This matrimonial appeal raises but two issues, both of which concern segments of the equitable distribution award effected below pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23. The appellant wife first asserts that, assuming the application of this court's decision in DiTolvo v. DiTolvo, 131 N.J.Super. 72 (App.Div. 1974), the trial judge acted arbitrarily in awarding to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases