IN RE CORRUGATED CONTAINER GRAND JURY

Nos. 80-1093, 80-1103 and 80-1264.

659 F.2d 1330 (1981)

In re CORRUGATED CONTAINER GRAND JURY and Corrugated Container Anti-trust Criminal and Civil Litigation. ADAMS EXTRACT COMPANY, et al., Appellees, v. ALTON BOX BOARD COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Kenneth Adler, et al., Intervenors-Appellants, James A. Braud, et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. In re CORRUGATED CONTAINER ANTITRUST LITIGATION. ADAMS EXTRACT CO., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, CFS Continental, Inc., et al., Townhouse Furniture, et al., Rossville Packing Co., et al., Denver Meat Co., et al., Carron Manufacturing Co., Andre-Boudin Bakeries, Inc., Ilikon Corp., Great Northern Packaging Corp., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees, Pleasure Hours, Inc., et al., London Dry Ltd., et al., Plaintiffs-Objectors-Appellants-Appellees, v. The CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION OF VIRGINIA, et al., Stone Container Corp., Defendants-Appellants-Appellees. In re CORRUGATED CONTAINER ANTITRUST LITIGATION. ADAMS EXTRACT CO., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ALTON BOX BOARD COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellants, James A. Braud, et al., Messrs. A, B and C, et al., Intervenors-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit A

Rehearings Denied November 27, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Roady, Houston, Tex., for Alton Box Board Co. et al.

Harold F. Baker, Howrey & Simon, Alan Wiseman, Washington, D. C., for Mead Corp.

Mandell & Wright, Stephen D. Susman, Houston, Tex., McGovern, Opperman & Paquin, Minneapolis, Minn., Sachnoff, Schraeger, Jones, Weaver & Rubenstein, Ltd., Lowell E. Sachnoff, Chicago, Ill., for Adams Extract Co. et al.

Ray V. Hartwell, III, Hunton & Williams, Thomas G. Slater, Jr., Douglas W. Kenyon, Richmond, Va., for Chesapeake Corp. of Va.

Before CHARLES CLARK, TATE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

These consolidated appeals challenge orders of the district court requiring the Department of Justice to turn over to the plaintiffs in this civil action transcripts of testimony given before a grand jury. Because we find that the appeals are moot, we vacate the judgment of the district court and dismiss the appeals.

The background of this multidistrict class action having been explained in prior opinions,1 we recite...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases