DUNIVEN v. COMMISSIONER

Docket No. 7753-80.

42 T.C.M. 1655 (1981)

T.C. Memo. 1981-656

James M. Duniven v. Commissioner.

United States Tax Court.

Filed November 10, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Duniven, pro se, Saticoy, Calif. Elaine T. Moriwaki, for the respondent.


Memorandum Opinion IRWIN, Judge: Respondent determined the following deficiencies and additions to tax in petitioners' Federal income taxes for 1974 and 1975: _______________________________________________________________________________ Section Section Section Year Deficiency 6651(a) 6653(a) 6654 _______________________________________________________________________________ 1974 ................. $5,810.08 $1,452.52 $290.50 $184.86 1975 ................. 2,374.81 593.70 118.74 102.54 _______________________________________________________________________________
At trial the parties orally stipulated that an agreement had been reached relating to the deficiencies for the taxable years in question.1 Accordingly, the only issues remaining for our decision concern the applicability of the corresponding additions to tax asserted by respondent under sections 6651(a), 6653(a), and 6654.2 The additions to tax determined by the respondent under sections 6651(a), 6653(a), and 6654 are for failure to file a tax return, negligence or intentional disregard of rules and regulations, and failure to pay estimated income tax, respectively. Section 6651(a) provides that in case of a taxpayer's failure to timely file a return, "unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect," an addition to tax shall be imposed. Section 6653(a) provides that if any part of the underpayment of tax "is due to negligence or intentional disregard of rules and regulations * * * there shall be added to the tax an amount equal to 5 percent of the underpayment." Petitioner has the burden to prove that his failure to file returns for the taxable years 1974 and 1975 was due to reasonable cause and that his failure to pay the tax due was not attributable to negligence or intentional disregard of rules and regulations in order to avoid the imposition of these additions to tax. Welch v. Helvering [3 USTC ¶ 1164], 290 U.S. 111 (1933); Rule 142(a), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Mr. Duniven did not present any evidence to permit this Court to find that respondent's determinations were in error. Accordingly, respondent's determinations are sustained. Respondent also determined that petitioner is liable for an addition to tax under section 6654 for failure to pay estimated income tax. Petitioner was self-employed during 1974 and 1975. He testified that he relied on his bookkeeper who in turn relied on advice from the Internal Revenue Service that such payments were not necessary. Although we sympathize with petitioner's position, the law is clear that the provisions of section 6654(a) are mandatory and this Court is not free to grant relief based on reasonable cause or lack of negligence. Estate of Barney Ruben v. Commissioner [Dec. 24,109], 33 T.C. 1071 (1960). Respondent's determination is therefore sustained. Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases