1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 514 F.Supp.
  5. 514 F.Supp. 926 (1981)
 

RAHAL v. CRESTMONT CADILLAC CORP.

Civ. A. No. C80-2337.

514 F.Supp. 926 (1981)

Daniel G. RAHAL, Plaintiff, v. CRESTMONT CADILLAC CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

May 6, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rush P. Webb, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Bruce P. Mandel, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

ORDER

CONTIE, District Judge.

Pending before the Court in the above captioned case are cross motions for summary judgment. The defendant Crestmont Cadillac Corporation (Cadillac) asserts that it is entitled to summary judgment on the basis that as a matter of law the plaintiff has not suffered any injury for the antitrust violations alleged within his complaint. The plaintiff Rahal, on the other hand, asserts that he is entitled to summary judgment pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases