1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 517 F.Supp.
  5. 517 F.Supp. 892 (1981)
 

KKO, INC. v. HONEYWELL, INC.

No. 77 C 2351.

517 F.Supp. 892 (1981)

KKO, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. HONEYWELL, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

May 4, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Max & Herman Chill, P.C., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Norman J. Barry, Jr., Baker & McKenzie, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Defendant Honeywell, Inc. ("Honeywell") formerly sold parts to plaintiffs KKO, Inc. ("KKO") and Keating of Chicago, Inc. ("Keating"), to be incorporated into electric deep fat fryers ("fryers") manufactured by plaintiffs for sale to commercial establishments. Plaintiffs now sue Honeywell for breach of warranty and fraudulent misrepresentation in connection with Honeywell's sales. Counts III and VIII of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases