1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 513 F.Supp.
  5. 513 F.Supp. 843 (1981)
 

HARSHBARGER v. FRANKS

No. C-3-79-241.

513 F.Supp. 843 (1981)

Melodie Kay HARSHBARGER et al., Plaintiffs, v. E. Karl FRANKS et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

April 29, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Huffman and Raymond L. Landis, Attys., West Milton, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Robert J. Surdyk, Atty., Dayton, Ohio, for defendant Piqua Fort Hotel, Inc.

Frederick Freed, Atty., Piqua, Ohio, for defendant E. Karl Franks.

W. McGregor Dixon, Jr., Atty., Troy, Ohio, for defendant Favorite City Realty, Inc.

Francis McDaniel, Atty., Dayton, Ohio, for defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc.

RICE, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Motions of Defendants Favorite City Realty, Inc., E. Karl Franks, Piqua Fort, Inc., and Greyhound Lines, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Favorite City, Franks, Piqua Fort, and Greyhound, respectively) for Summary Judgment under Fed.R. of Civ. Pro. 56. The latter three Defendants have maintained that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law because no Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases