1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 280 S.E.2d
  5. 280 S.E.2d 751 (1981)
 

STATE v. SUTTON

No. 811SC95.

280 S.E.2d 751 (1981)

STATE of North Carolina v. Chester O. SUTTON.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 4, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Ben G. Irons, II, Raleigh, for the State.

Whitted, Jordan & Matthewson by Louis Jordan and Reginald Kenan, Goldsboro, for defendant-appellant.

CLARK, Judge.

Defendant's attorney violated Rule 28(b)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure which requires that exceptions and assignments of error be set out after each question argued in appellant's brief. Although we elect to reach the merits of defendant's case as authorized under Rule 2, we note that defendant, by not referring us to the point in the record where the alleged error occurred, has placed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases