1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 288 Md.
  5. 288 Md. 656 (1980)
 

HOPE v. BALTIMORE COUNTY

[No. 9, September Term, 1980.]

288 Md. 656 (1980)

421 A.2d 576

DANIEL HOPE, JR. ET AL. v. BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided October 27, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Victor McFarland, with whom was Louis J. Weinkam on the brief, for appellants.

John A. Austin, Assistant County Solicitor, with whom was Leonard S. Jacobson, County Solicitor, on the brief, for appellee Baltimore County, Maryland. Charles B. Heyman, with whom were Ellen W. Fales, and Kaplan, Heyman, Greenberg, Engelman & Belgrad, John Martin Jones, Jr., Mark Pollak and Piper & Marbury on the brief, for other appellees.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, DIGGES, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON and RODOWSKY, JJ.

SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

We shall here hold that because Baltimore County Charter § 601 created and established a county board of appeals implementing Maryland Code (1957) Art. 25A, § 5 (U), a party aggrieved by the approval or disapproval of a subdivision plat in that county must appeal to that county's board of appeals and may not appeal directly to the circuit court. Hence, we shall affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases