1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 444 U.S.
  5. 444 U.S. 453 (1980)
 

SECRETARY OF NAVY v. HUFF

No. 78-599.

444 U.S. 453 (1980)

100 S.Ct. 606

62 L.Ed.2d 607

SECRETARY OF THE NAVY ET AL. v. HUFF ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 21, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kent L. Jones argued the cause pro hac vice for petitioners. On the briefs was Solicitor General McCree.

Alan Dranitzke argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was David Addlestone.

PER CURIAM.

The question in this case is whether Navy and Marine Corps regulations violate 10 U. S. C. § 1034 by requiring military personnel on an overseas base to obtain command approval before circulating petitions addressed to Members of Congress. Section 1034 provides that "[n]o person may restrict any member of an armed force in communicating with a member of Congress, unless the communication is unlawful or violates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases