1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 617 P.2d
  5. 617 P.2d 250 (1980)
 

PROFIT v. CITY OF TULSA

Nos. M-79-136, M-79-135, M-79-134, and M-79-45.

617 P.2d 250 (1980)

Patricia Ann PROFIT, Phyllis Johnson, Ola Faye Hay, Appellants, v. The CITY OF TULSA, Appellee.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

As Corrected November 21, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald H. Mook, Tulsa, for appellants.

Waldo F. Bales, City Atty. by Richard J. Kallsnick, Asst. City Atty., Tulsa, for appellee.

OPINION

CORNISH, Presiding Judge:

The appellants were convicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Tulsa for the Offense of Loitering for the Purpose of Prostitution in Case Nos. 257530, 258125, 258126 and 257832. Punishment ranged from thirty (30) to sixty (60) days.

Some of the acts forming the basis for the appellants' convictions were: (1) Standing in the doorway of a house and yelling at the male...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases