SPILKY v. HIRSCH


102 Misc.2d 536 (1980)

Abraham H. Spilky et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Philip Hirsch, Appellant-Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

February 19, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Isaac Anolic for appellant-respondent. Abraham H. Spilky and Robert M. Spilky, respondents-appellants pro se.

Concur: ASCH, J. P., TIERNEY and RICCOBONO, JJ.


Per Curiam.

Order entered July 10, 1979 (B. COHEN, J.) is affirmed, without costs.

The plaintiffs are attorneys acting pro se, who seek recovery from the defendant for legal services. The defendant has asserted a number of counterclaims against the plaintiffs, one of which, i.e., the fourth, seeks recovery for slander. Defendant's fourth counterclaim alleges that the plaintiffs told defendant's attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases