1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 503 F.Supp.
  5. 503 F.Supp. 102 (1980)
 

HARNISCHFEGER CORP. v. PACCAR, INC.

No. 79-C-441.

503 F.Supp. 102 (1980)

HARNISCHFEGER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. PACCAR, INC., Paccar Machinery Corporation, Charles M. Pigott, James C. Pigott, Citicorp, and Citibank, N.A., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin.

November 6, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Husmann, Michael, Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, Wis., Walter T. Kuhlmey, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

David A. Baker, Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, Wis., for Paccar.

Bruce R. Bauer, Quarles & Brady, Milwaukee, Wis., for Citicorp.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WARREN, District Judge.

The question before the Court on this motion for attorneys' fees is whether plaintiff, who obtained a preliminary injunction against a corporate takeover and had that preliminary injunction affirmed on appeal, has "substantially prevailed" in this action within the meaning of that phrase in Section 16 of the Clayton Act. Subsequent to affirmance of the Court's granting of the preliminary injunction but prior to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases