1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 505 F.Supp.
  5. 505 F.Supp. 73 (1980)
 

EUTECTIC CORP. v. METCO, INC.

No. 80 C 268.

505 F.Supp. 73 (1980)

EUTECTIC CORPORATION, New Metals Corporation, and Metallizing Company of America, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. METCO, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E. D. New York.

December 18, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hopgood, Calimafde, Kalil, Blaustein & Lieberman, New York City by John M. Calimafde, Marvin N. Gordon, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Sprung, Felfe, Horn, Lynch & Kramer, New York City, for defendant; Arnold Sprung and Nathaniel D. Kramer, New York City, Salvatore A. Giarratana, Norwalk, Conn., of counsel.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEAHER, District Judge.

This is an action by an adjudged patent infringer to set aside a judgment of patent validity alleged to have been obtained by a fraud committed on the court, and to recover treble antitrust damages resulting from defendant's allegedly fraudulent enforcement of the patents held valid. In its original action, 72 C 102, plaintiff Eutectic Corporation ("Eutectic") sought a declaratory judgment that defendant's ("Metco...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases