HOCK v. UNEMPL. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW ET AL.

No. 339 C.D. 1979.

50 Pa.Commw. 517 (1980)

Vincent M. Hock, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review and Lehigh Portland Cement Company, Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

April 16, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent M. Hock, for himself, petitioner.

Gary Marini, Assistant Attorney General, with him David R. Confer, Assistant Attorney General, Richard Wagner, Chief Counsel and Edward G. Biester, Jr., Attorney General, for respondents.

Argued March 10, 1980, before Judges MENCER, BLATT and MacPHAIL, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE MacPHAIL, April 16, 1980:

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the receipt of termination benefits disqualifies a claimant from receiving unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Sections 4(u) and 404 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. [1937] 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §§ 753(u) and 804. We are constrained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases