1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 127 Ariz.
  5. 127 Ariz. 405 (1980)
 

SPITZ v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF CITY OF PHOENIX

No. 15096.

127 Ariz. 405 (1980)

621 P.2d 911

Harry B. SPITZ, Petitioner, v. The MUNICIPAL COURT OF the CITY OF PHOENIX, Arizona, and The Honorable Lyle Allen, Judge thereof; The Honorable Keith Haien, Judge thereof; and The City of Phoenix Prosecutor's Office, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

December 16, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harris & Peacock by Donald W. Harris, Eldridge & Brown by Steve J. Brown, Steven R. Chanen, Phoenix, for petitioner.

Andy Baumert, Phoenix City Atty. by Lauraine Rees Crawford, Asst. City Prosecutor, Phoenix, for respondents.

CAMERON, Justice.

We granted this petition for special action because it is a matter of state-wide importance and because there was not equal, plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal. Rule 1, Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S.

We must answer the following questions:

1. Is the sale of alcoholic beverages to a person under the age of 19 a misdemeanor in violation of A.R.S. § 4-244(9), a crime requiring guilty knowledge?

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases