1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 176 N.J.
  5. 176 N.J. Super. 215 (1980)
 

STATE v. CRUDUP

176 N.J. Super. 215 (1980)

422 A.2d 790

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIE L. CRUDUP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 28, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Charles argued the cause for appellant (Ashley & Charles, attorneys).

Mary Anne Kredatus, Assistant Essex County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (John J. Degnan, Attorney General, attorney; Donald S. Coburn, Essex County Prosecutor, of counsel; John J. Haggerty, III, Assistant Prosecutor, on the letter brief).

Before Judges BOTTER, KING and McELROY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, J.A.D.

Defendant was found guilty of possession of lottery slips, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:121-3(b), and with working for a lottery, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:121-3(a). He received a custodial sentence and now appeals, claiming that (1) the trial judge unreasonably restricted his right to cross-examine the State's witness, Detective Lang of the narcotics squad, (2) the jury verdict was improperly returned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases