ROMEO v. ROMEO


84 N.J. 289 (1980)

418 A.2d 259

IRENE ROMEO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. IRENE ROMEO, T/A CLUB 37, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 16, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry D. Maurer argued the cause for appellant (Maurer & Maurer, attorneys).

Patrick C. English argued the cause for respondent (Enright, Porter & Lenney, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by PASHMAN, J.

In this case a wife seeks dependency benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-1 et seq., by reason of the death of her husband in the course of his employment by the wife. We must consider whether the common law rule that contracts between spouses are unenforceable prevented the existence of a valid employment relationship — a prerequisite for recovery.

I

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases