1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 103 Cal.App.3d
  5. 103 Cal.App.3d 191 (1980)
 

CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH v. BAILEY

Docket No. 18844.

103 Cal.App.3d 191 (1980)

162 Cal. Rptr. 663

CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GARY A. BAILEY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

March 6, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Floyd L. Morrow for Defendants and Appellants.

Jack F. Fitzmaurice, City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

HENDERSON, J.*

The City of Imperial Beach (City) filed a complaint for declaratory relief requesting a determination whether the city council (Council) could renew or extend a contract it had with Gary and Hazel Bailey doing business as Imperial Beach Concession (Concession). The court granted City's motion for summary judgment and ruled City could not contract with Concession.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases