1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 126 Ariz.
  5. 126 Ariz. 129 (1980)
 

THOMPSON v. THOMPSON

No. 2 CA-CIV 3340.

126 Ariz. 129 (1980)

613 P.2d 289

Edward C. THOMPSON, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Mary L. THOMPSON, Respondent/Appellee, and Aboud & Aboud, Intervenor/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Supplemental Opinion on Motion for Rehearing April 16, 1980.

Rehearing Denied May 21, 1980.

Review Denied June 17, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Weinstein, Tucson, for petitioner/appellant.

Aboud & Aboud by John Eli Aboud, Tucson, in pro. per.

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

A post-dissolution order is the subject of this appeal. Mrs. Thompson, who prevailed below, has filed no answering brief. However, we have granted her attorneys' request to intervene to protect their award of attorneys' fees.1

The threshold question is whether the former Mrs. Thompson, by failing to file an answering brief, has confessed error. It is well settled that where debatable issues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases