1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 125 Ariz.
  5. 125 Ariz. 127 (1980)
 

HUM v. PINNER

No. 2 CA-CIV 3286.

125 Ariz. 127 (1980)

608 P.2d 64

Tom HUM and Josephine Hum, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Arthur PINNER and Elizabeth Pinner, husband and wife; Santa Cruz Ranch, Inc.; Clyde Watson and William Watson, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Rehearing Denied February 13, 1980.

Review Denied March 4, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Molloy, Jones, Donahue, Trachta, Childers & Mallamo, P.C. by John F. Molloy and Tobin Rosen, Tucson, for plaintiffs/appellants.

Chandler, Tullar, Udall & Redhair by Thomas Chandler, Tucson, for defendants/appellees Pinner & Santa Cruz Ranch.

Hirsch & Lindamood, P.C. by W. James Harrison, Tucson, for defendants/appellees Watson.

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Arthur and Elizabeth Pinner own all the capital stock in Santa Cruz, Inc. The main asset of the corporation is a 1,240-acre ranch located near Marana, Arizona. The Watsons leased the ranch from the corporation. Their lease gave them the right to renewal and also a right of first refusal on any sale of the ranch.

The Hums entered into a contract with the Pinners (stockholders) to buy all their stock in the corporation. Their agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases