1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 93 Wn.2d
  5. 93 Wn.2d 84 (1980)
 

DUTIL v. STATE

Nos. 46151, 46286.

93 Wn.2d 84 (1980)

606 P.2d 269

DAVID M. DUTIL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. CHARLES G. STOCKWELL, Respondent. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. SCOTT D. DORSEY, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

January 31, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilford A. Anderson of Seattle-King County Public Defender Association and William S. Bailey, Public Defender, for appellant Dutil, petitioner Dorsey, and respondent Stockwell.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and James A. Trujillo and Thomas L. Pugh, Deputies, for State.

ROSELLINI, J.

In these three cases, we review rulings of superior court judges in hearings conducted pursuant to CrR 3.5, to determine the admissibility of statements of juveniles over the age of 12. In each case, the statement was given to police who questioned the juvenile in a custodial setting shortly after his apprehension.

In the Dutil and Dorsey hearings, it was found that, under all of the circumstances, the juveniles had been advised of and understood...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases